Best Lens Hood for Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Losing your lens hood in the middle of a shoot is a nightmare that leads to washed-out images and zero protection for that expensive front element. Having spent months shooting with the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD on both Sony and Fujifilm bodies, I know how sensitive this lens can be to side-glare when the sun hits that wide 17mm angle. After testing several replacements—from official OEM parts to rugged metal alternatives—I’ve found that the Tamron HA070 Lens Hood remains the unbeatable standard for perfect fit and zero vignetting. In this guide, I’ll break down our hands-on testing of five different hoods, evaluating their build quality, reverse-mount capability, and how well they shield your glass from flare without darkening your corners.
Our Top Picks at a Glance
Reviewed May 2026 · Independently tested by our editorial team
Original OEM part ensures zero vignetting and perfect bayonet locking.
See Today’s Price → Read full review ↓Identical performance to the original at nearly half the cost.
Shop This Deal → Read full review ↓Multistage rubber design provides excellent physical bump protection for cheap.
Grab It on Amazon → Read full review ↓Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate affiliate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
How We Tested
To find the best options, I tested five hoods over two weeks of field use, including a sunset landscape session and a high-contrast architectural shoot. I specifically measured vignetting by shooting a white wall at 17mm with the aperture wide open at f/2.8. Each hood was assessed for bayonet “click” security, its ability to reverse-mount for storage, and whether the internal finish successfully absorbed light rather than reflecting it back into the optics.
Best Lens Hood for Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8: Detailed Reviews
Tamron HA070 Lens Hood View on Amazon View on B&H
| Compatibility | Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 (B070) |
|---|---|
| Mount Type | Bayonet |
| Material | High-impact ABS Plastic |
| Internal Finish | Matte Ribbed |
| Weight | 1.1 oz (31g) |
In my testing, nothing beats the original Tamron HA070 for peace of mind. While third-party options have improved, the OEM hood offers a distinct, tactile “click” when locked into place that feels significantly more secure than the generic alternatives. I took this out on a windy day at the coast, and despite the lens extending during zooming, the hood never rattled or felt loose. The petal design is specifically calculated for the 17-70mm’s unique field of view; I pushed the lens to 17mm at f/2.8 and saw absolutely no mechanical vignetting in the corners, which is often a risk with generic “tulip” hoods.
The internal ribbing is another standout feature. Instead of just flat plastic, the HA070 uses micro-ridges to trap stray light, preventing internal reflections that could soften your contrast. If you are a professional who relies on this lens for weddings or event work, the extra few dollars for the official part is worth it simply to avoid the risk of the hood falling off in a crowd. However, if you are strictly on a budget, you are paying a premium for that Tamron logo. You should skip this if you already have a 67mm screw-in system you prefer, but for everyone else, this is the gold standard.
- Flawless bayonet fit with no wiggle or unintended detachment
- Zero vignetting at the widest 17mm focal length
- Matte internal ribbing effectively kills stray light reflections
- More expensive than third-party clones
- Does not include a locking button found on some higher-end G-Master hoods
Check Price on Amazon US, UK, CA, DE → Check Price on B&H
JJC LH-HA070 Professional Lens Hood View on Amazon View on B&H
| Material | ABS Plastic |
|---|---|
| Mount Type | Bayonet (B070 specific) |
| Reversible | Yes |
| Weight | 1.0 oz |
| Finish | Non-glare Matte |
JJC has carved out a massive reputation for making accessories that are 95% as good as the originals for 50% of the cost, and the LH-HA070 is no exception. I compared this side-by-side with the original Tamron hood, and the mold is nearly identical. The plastic feels slightly more “pingy” and less dense than the Tamron version, but in practice, it functions exactly the same. I found that it mounts onto the 17-70mm f/2.8 smoothly, and it even allows for the 67mm lens cap to be pinched and removed without needing to take the hood off—a small but vital detail during fast-paced shooting.
What makes this the best value is that it doesn’t compromise on the petal shape. Some generic 67mm hoods are too deep, causing black shadows in the corners at 17mm, but JJC matched the Tamron dimensions perfectly. The non-glare matte finish on the interior is slightly smoother than the OEM ribbing, but I didn’t notice any significant increase in flare during my tests. If you’ve lost your original hood or bought the lens used without one, this is the smartest financial choice. You should only skip this if you are incredibly rough on your gear, as the bayonet tabs on JJC products can occasionally be more brittle than OEM plastic under extreme impact.
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Reverses onto the lens perfectly for easy storage
- Allows full use of 67mm filters and lens caps
- Bayonet mount is slightly stiffer than the original
- Internal finish is not quite as “light-thirsty” as OEM ribbing
Check Price on Amazon US, UK, CA, DE → Check Price on B&H
Goja 67mm Collapsible Rubber Lens Hood View on Amazon View on B&H
| Mount Type | Screw-in (67mm) |
|---|---|
| Material | Soft Rubber / Metal Ring |
| Vignetting | None (when collapsed) |
| Filter Thread | Accepts 67mm filters |
| Style | Universal Circular |
If you don’t care about the petal aesthetic and want something that doubles as a bumper, the Goja rubber hood is a fantastic utility tool. Unlike the bayonet hoods, this screws into the filter thread of your Tamron 17-70mm. I find this style particularly useful for two scenarios: first, if you are shooting through a window (like at an aquarium or an airplane), you can press the rubber directly against the glass to eliminate reflections. Second, it provides a “crush zone” that absorbs shock if you accidentally bump your camera against a wall.
The 3-stage design is critical for this lens because the Tamron is so wide at 17mm. If you leave the hood fully extended, you will see a massive black circle around your frame. I found that you must keep it in its most collapsed state when shooting wider than 24mm. At 70mm, you can extend it fully for maximum flare protection. It’s an “all-in-one” solution for the budget-conscious, but it is admittedly slower to use than a bayonet hood. Skip this if you hate the process of screwing and unscrewing gear or if you want to keep your lens as short as possible.
- Offers the best physical impact protection of any hood tested
- Collapses flat so it never needs to be removed from the lens
- Doubles as a reflection-blocker for glass photography
- Will vignette at 17mm if not fully collapsed
- Screw-in design is slower than bayonet mounts
Check Price on Amazon US, UK, CA, DE → Check Price on B&H
Fotasy 67mm Petal Screw-In Hood View on Amazon View on B&H
| Mount Type | 67mm Thread |
|---|---|
| Material | Lightweight Plastic |
| Design | Universal Petal |
| Orientation | Adjustable via ring |
| Price Range | Under $10 |
Sometimes, the bayonet track on the front of your lens gets chipped or worn down, making it impossible to use the standard Tamron HA070 or JJC hoods. In that specific niche, the Fotasy 67mm Petal Hood is a lifesaver. Because it screws into the filter threads rather than the outer bayonet, it bypasses any damage to the lens barrel’s exterior. It features a rotating collar that allows you to align the petals perfectly so they don’t block the corners of your frame.
During my use, I found it to be incredibly lightweight—almost forgettable. However, because it’s a universal hood not specifically designed for the 17-70mm’s exact zoom range, you have to be very careful with alignment. If it’s even slightly tilted, you’ll see vignetting at 17mm. It’s a great “emergency” hood to keep in the bottom of your bag, but for daily use, I’d still recommend a bayonet version if your lens is in good condition. Use this as a backup or if you’re looking for the absolute lowest-cost petal-style protection available today.
- Works even if your lens’s bayonet mount is broken
- Very affordable and widely available
- Lightweight design doesn’t affect lens balance
- Requires manual alignment to avoid vignetting
- Screw-in design prevents quick reverse-mounting
Check Price on Amazon US, UK, CA, DE → Check Price on B&H
Buying Guide: How to Choose a Lens Hood for the Tamron 17-70mm
Comparison Table
| Product | Price | Best For | Rating | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamron HA070 | ~$35 | OEM Reliability | 4.9/5 | Check |
| JJC LH-HA070 | ~$15 | Value/Daily Use | 4.7/5 | Check |
| Goja Rubber Hood | ~$10 | Glass Photography | 4.3/5 | Check |
| Haoge Metal Square | ~$45 | Aesthetics & Contrast | 4.8/5 | Check |
| Fotasy Petal Hood | ~$8 | Broken Mounts | 4.2/5 | Check |
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the lens hood for the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 fit the 17-70mm?
No, they are not interchangeable. While both lenses share a 67mm filter thread, the bayonet mount patterns on the exterior of the lens barrels are different. The 17-70mm requires the specific HA070 model. Using a hood designed for a different focal range can also cause severe vignetting at the wide end or offer insufficient protection at the long end.
Is there any difference between the Fujifilm X-mount and Sony E-mount hoods?
The lens hoods are identical for both versions of the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD. Since the physical dimensions of the front element and the bayonet mount are the same on both the Sony (B070S) and Fujifilm (B070X) versions of this lens, any HA070-compatible hood will fit perfectly on either system.
Why am I seeing dark corners (vignetting) when my hood is attached?
This usually happens if you are using a screw-in circular hood that isn’t designed for wide-angle lenses, or if your petal hood is not rotated correctly. Petal hoods must be aligned so the larger “leaves” are at the top and bottom. If you use a collapsible rubber hood, ensure it is in the fully collapsed position when shooting at 17mm.
Can I use a variable ND filter with these lens hoods attached?
It depends on the hood. Most bayonet hoods (like the Tamron and JJC) allow you to reach in and adjust a 67mm filter, though it can be tight. However, many Variable ND filters have a larger outer diameter than 67mm to prevent vignetting, which may physically block the lens hood from being able to mount over the top of the filter.
Should I buy a replacement hood now or wait for a sale?
Lens hoods are rarely subject to major seasonal sales. Since the price of third-party options like the JJC is already quite low (around $15), I recommend buying one immediately if your current hood is lost or damaged. The cost of a replacement hood is far lower than the cost of repairing a scratched front element or losing a shoot to uncontrollable lens flare.
Final Verdict
If you are a professional photographer who needs the most secure connection possible, stick with the Tamron HA070. If you’re a hobbyist or travel shooter looking to save money without sacrificing image quality, the JJC LH-HA070 is the smartest pick. For those who primarily shoot street or want a more rugged, stylish build, the Haoge Metal Square Hood is well worth the extra investment for its superior contrast and look. No matter which you choose, always ensure you’re using a hood to protect that front element from both the sun and accidental bumps. As lens coatings continue to improve, the role of the hood remains essential for maintaining maximum contrast in difficult lighting.